• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Agile Buddha

Demystifying Agile, Getting to its Core

  • Our Blog – Agile Buddha
  • Agile Workshops and Certifications
  • Agile Commune – Join Here!
  • Webinars
  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Agile

Agile Thinking: Continuous Improvement – ScrumMaster 1.0 to 2.0

by Avienaash Shiralige 7 Comments

Readers, Our “Agile Thinking” series is focussed on bringing agility into our thinking as this helps in moving from Doing-Agile to Being-Agile. You can read our earlier article in this series Agile Thinking: Stop Starting, Start Finishing.

This post talks about continuous improvement and obviously this can be applied everywhere irrespective of it is a process, practice or a role. From my recent experience, I would like to share today, how ScrumMater (SM) role evolved in some of the companies.

In many organizations, ScrumMaster role is defined something similar to what is shown below. For conversation sake let’s call it as SM 1.0 (see pic below)

ScrumMaster

In service industry projects,  SM’s playing the role by book (SM 1.0) and expecting Product Owner(PO)  from the client side to write stories, acceptance criteria and prioritization did not work due to some of the reasons stated below.

[Read more…] about Agile Thinking: Continuous Improvement – ScrumMaster 1.0 to 2.0

Agile Thinking : Stop Starting, Start Finishing

by ShriKant Vashishtha 13 Comments

Limiting “Work in Process” (WIP) items is one of key ideas of Kanban. A natural outcome of it, inherently coming from Lean philosophy is to stop starting and start finishing.

By having too many work in process items, it looks like everybody is busy but there is no functional outcome for the end user. So, instead, it’s important to work towards completing the user-story.

From the outset it looks like, “Stop starting, start finishing” philosophy is limited to Lean and Kanban world. Scrum world is either doing it well or doesn’t need it. Right?

Wrong!!!

Let’s take a look at a typical Scrum standup.

[Read more…] about Agile Thinking : Stop Starting, Start Finishing

Webinar: How to Scale Agile using SAFe Framework

by Avienaash Shiralige Leave a Comment

Scrum and XP have been working well for small teams. That works fabulously for small organizations. However implementing the same for large project portfolios, having teams with 100+ developers has remained very challenging from organization perspective.

There are many challenges while working with large teams like:

  • Breaking silos/departments in large organizations
  • Requirements focused on changes in enterprise architecture
  • Ability to work on highest business value features for program portfolio instead of for a project
  • Eliminate waste and reduce cycle time for the whole value chain
  • ..and more

They can be mitigated by seeing scrum as organization design framework and using lean principles. In this session Shrikant will share his thoughts on how Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is used to solve this problem. We will take references from Spotify Scaling Case Study, SAFe and personal experiences.

Date: Feb 19th, 3:00 – 4:00 PM IST

Register Now!

Improve Sprint Throughput with “Definition of Ready”

by ShriKant Vashishtha 4 Comments

Teams are obsessive towards better customer satisfaction and rightly so.

High team value throughput is one of the important ingredients towards better customer satisfaction. Before we move further, let’s look at what throughput means in business context. According to Wikipedia:

Throughput can be best described as the rate at which a system generates its products / services per unit of time.

In order to achieve better throughput, it’s implicit to look inwards, within the development team. However some improvement areas may lie in other quarters.

Product Ownership is one such area which may have a massive impact on a team’s throughput. In this post we’ll look at throughput impact and will discuss how it can then be solved through “Definition of READY”.

Context

For lots of Scrum teams, the Product Backlot Items (PBIs) may not have sufficient clarity before moving to a sprint. For cases in which the Product Owner and rest of the stakeholders are sitting next to the development team and easily accessible, the Scrum team can work together to get the required clarity during the sprint.

However in lots of other cases:

  • the Product Owner may not be able to spend enough time in shaping the product backlog. He’s also not able to spend time with the development teams in clarifying their doubts on the Product Backlog. This can happen because of various reasons.
  • the Product Owner and rest of the stakeholders may be sitting in different parts of the world. They may not be easily accessible because of time-zone differences and lots of handoffs, and each-one having their own priorities.

All these scenarios almost immediately impact the sprint execution.

As Product Backlot Items (PBIs) are not clear enough, the team begins with half baked information.

In such cases, something which could be finished within 2 hours (if all information readily available), may take a week to complete while clarifying those questions in between.

This resultant lack of sufficient information impacts the team throughput. The development team on their own can’t do much in such a context.

However, it would help the development team a lot, if they could have a definition similar to Definition of Done on the PBI level as well. That way only those PBIs which have sufficient information available for the development move to a sprint. That definition is “Definition of Ready”.

What is Definition of Ready

The Definition of Ready is similar to the Definition of DONE, but with the following differences.

In case of Definition of Done, the Scrum development team creates a DONE increment for the customer.

For the case of Definition of Ready,  it’s the Product Owner who is accountable in shaping READY PBIs for the development team.

In other words, any PBI coming inside Sprint backlog has to be READY and any PBI moving out of Sprint must be DONE.

In order to come up with “READY to play” PBIs, the team conducts regular backlog refinement sessions with the Product Owner.

The simplistic “Definition of Ready” looks something like this.

When is a PBI Ready?

In general, a PBI is ready when following conditions are satisfied

  • The Product Backlog Item (PBI) has value.
  • The PBI is immediately actionable by the team. The team is clear on the functional as well as non-functional understanding of the PBI.
  • There is no outstanding question/dependency remaining that could stop the team from working on the card, be it test/dev or whatever.
  • The PBI has acceptance criteria and it has been discussed along with the team during backlog refinement conversation.
  • The Scrum team has discussed it together.
  • The PBI is sized (in story points/ t-shirt sizing etc)
  • The PBI is small

In general it’s the team which decides whether the PBI is ready or not.

Only ready PBIs become the candidate of the sprint planning

The Readiness of Product Backlog

A Product Backlog is “Ready” if it has enough Product Backlog Items at its top, meeting these criteria, to fill a Sprint.

Note that all PBI in the Product Backlog do not have to be Ready, though as they move up the Product Backlog, they should progress toward becoming Ready.

Definition of Ready is Mandatory in a Multi Time-zone Distributed Agile

It’s quite common to see completely opposite views from Agile purists on Definition of Ready as they believe that it is not required at all.

That may be true to some extent for collocated teams supported by dedicated Product Owners available when required for clarification in the same time zone.

However, distributed Agile in different time-zones is a different beast altogether. It’s quite common for such teams to work with customers in opposite time-zones. Distributed communication in such cases introduces delays.

So the clarification which you receive in minutes face-to-face with the collocated Product Owner may require multiple iterations of distributed communication. Multiple iterations sometimes mean multiple days.

So a READY PBI which could be finished in 2 hours now may take days to complete because-of to and fro communication between distributed team-members to resolve unresolved queries.

The difference in such cases is all about between holding cost and transaction cost. In distributed multi time-zones teams, the transaction cost of distributed communication for getting questions answers through a Product Owner tends to be high. That’s the reason, the team tends to keep (hold) a bunch of PBIs ready for the planning purposes so that sprint time doesn’t go waste in to and fro communication but the team is able to focus on getting things done.

Definition of Ready in such cases helps in bringing clarity and helps in keeping team members and the product owner on the same page. Any absence of clarity essentially introduces long delays and impacts the throughput of a sprint.

How To Do Effective Capacity Planning on The Scrum Team

by Avienaash Shiralige 11 Comments

During sprint planning, scrum teams often face this challenge of sprint commitments. How many stories can we commit in this sprint? How to plan for the team capacity?

I ask teams to do commitment driven planning during early stages of scrum adoption.  For you to commit to a sprint goal, you need to know current team capacity. Team capacity is calculated as per people availability in that sprint.

Let’s take an example.

[Read more…] about How To Do Effective Capacity Planning on The Scrum Team

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

LikeBox

Tags

5 Whys Acceptance Criteria Adoption agile Agile Culture Agile Estimation Agile Offshore Agile Teams agile testing Agile Thinking Agile Transformation Agility Appraisals ATDD Automation Backlog Grooming BDD Big Picture business analyst Capacity Planning case-study code quality Collaboration Daily Scrum DevOps distributed agile Distributed Scrum Estimation Good Practices kanban kanban-mythbusters lean Metrics Planning Poker Prioritisation product owner Scrum ScrumMaster Sprint Sprint Demo Sprint Retrospective Story Point Story Points Sustainable Pace User Story

Categories

  • Agile
  • Agile Leadership
  • Agile Testing
  • Agile Transformation
  • ATDD
  • BDD
  • Continuous Inspection
  • Culture
  • DevOps
  • Distributed Agile
  • Estimation
  • In Conversation with Tim Ottinger
  • Java
  • Jira
  • Kanban
  • Lean
  • noprojects
  • Patterns
  • Presentation
  • Product Owner
  • Scaled Agile
  • Scrum
  • Software Metrics
  • Testing
  • Testing Practices
  • User Story

Copyright © 2025 · Malonus Consulting LLP

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Privacy Policy